Recognising reflections and apparent light sources

Avoiding measurement errors on Plexiglas, grilles and other sound-reflective surfaces

1. Why ultrasound can be reflected

Ultrasound propagates through air and can be reflected off hard surfaces. Typical reflective surfaces include concrete floors, glass, Plexiglas, sheet metal cladding, smooth machine casings and metallic surfaces. Put simply: the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection.

Reflections can lead to a misinterpretation of the sound’s origin. In this case, a hotspot is displayed on a reflective surface, even though the actual leak is located elsewhere.

asset_image

Reflection from a sound-reflective surface: In addition to the direct signal, an echo may be generated which appears on the display as an apparent sound source.

2. Acoustically transparent grilles vs. solid panels

Mesh screens and protective fences are often largely permeable to ultrasonic waves. The sound waves can pass through the openings, meaning that sound sources remain visible even when located behind the barrier.

In contrast, solid surfaces such as Plexiglas, glass, sheet metal, concrete or smooth machine casings act as strong reflectors. They can bounce the ultrasound back, thereby creating reflections or seemingly displaced sound sources.

asset_imageasset_image
Protective grilles can be largely acoustically transparent to ultrasound. The hotspot remains visible despite the barrier.Example of localisation through a mesh screen. Solid panes or surfaces, on the other hand, can strongly reflect ultrasound.

3. Why ultrasound should not be measured through Plexiglas

Where barriers are closed, measurements should not be taken through the surface. If it is not possible to open the casing whilst the system is in operation, a measurement point with a direct acoustic line of sight to the pressurised components should be selected.

In the example shown, an open gap in the Plexiglas casing allows a direct sound path between the leak point and the microphone array. The solid Plexiglas surface is not used as a measurement path in this case.

asset_image

Leak on a packaging machine with a Plexiglas enclosure. The measurement is not taken through the Plexiglas, but via an open gap.

4. Distinguishing between genuine leaks and reflections

The most important step in the inspection is to change the viewing angle. A real sound source remains visible on the same component even when the camera position is changed. Reflections, on the other hand, change their position or disappear completely. In case of doubt, the sound source should be checked from at least two different positions.

asset_image

Direct sound and reflection: The actual leak is located on the pressurised component; an additional hotspot may be caused by reflected sound waves.

Observation on the displayProbable causeRecommended action
Hotspot remains consistently visible on a valve, hose or pipeActual sound sourceChange your viewing angle and check the position of the maximum level
Hotspot moves across the floor, wall or a smooth surfaceReflection / echoChange the camera position and check whether the hotspot changes position
The hotspot appears behind Plexiglas or a closed panelReflected ultrasound or shielded sound sourceLook for an open area or gap with a direct sound path
Multiple hotspots in the event of a severe leakDirect sound and reflectionsPrioritise the nearest hotspot on the pressurised component

5. Checklist for the measurement

  • Do not use enclosed surfaces as the measurement path; look for open gaps or direct sound paths.
  • Check the hotspot from at least two angles.
  • Prioritise a stable hotspot on the pressurised component.
  • Critically assess reflections from the floor, walls, sheet metal, glass and Plexiglas.
  • For directional leaks, locate the angle with the highest stable level.
  • Document or repair severe leaks first, as they can mask reflections and weaker leaks.